Brighton and Hove Logo

Top of page

Size: View this website with medium text View this website with high visibility

5.3.1 Looked After Reviews


Please note that for the purpose of this procedure ‘Looked After Review’ is used to cover the following types of review process:

  • Me and My World Review;
  • Pathway Plan Review;
  • Adoption Plan Review.

Note that different provisions apply to children who acquire Looked After status as a result of a remand to local authority accommodation or Youth Detention Accommodation (see Remands to Local Authority Accommodation or to Youth Detention Accommodation Procedure).


Appointment and Role of the Independent Reviewing Officer Procedure

Children Looked After being Placed Outside Brighton and Hove and Children Being Placed in Brighton and Hove by Other Local Authorities

Delegated Authority to Foster Carers


Visiting & Review Schedule for Looked After Children (2015)


In November 2018, the chapter was significantly updated throughout and to reflect the three types of review: Me and My World Review; Pathway Plan Review and Adoption Plan Review. Additional practice guidance was provided. Section 11, The Role of the Review in Achieving Permanence for the Child was amended to reflect the outcome of a High Court Judgement in respect of children who were subject to Section 20 and where there were concerns of significant delays in their planning for permanence. The court noted the IROs’ recognition and action over a number of reviews but acknowledged that a more robust response had been needed.


  1. Types of Review Covered in these Procedures
  2. Preparation for Review and Monitoring of Review Decisions
  3. The Purpose of Reviews
  4. Frequency of Reviews
  5. Chairing of Reviews
  6. Convening Reviews
  7. Invitations and the Child's Participation
  8. The Role of the Social Worker
  9. Supporters and Interpreters
  10. Independent Reviewing Officer's Responsibilities
  11. The Role of the Review in Achieving Permanence for the Child
  12. Reviews Concerning Children in Long Term Foster Placements
  13. Reviews on Children who are the Subject of Child Protection Plans
  14. Recording of Reviews
  15. Review Decisions
  16. Monitoring of Review Decisions
  17. Conflict Resolution

1. Types of Review Covered in these Procedures

Please note that for the purpose of this procedure ‘Looked After Review’ is used to cover the following types of review process:

  • Me and My World Review;
  • Pathway Plan Review;
  • Adoption Plan Review.

2. Preparation for Review and Monitoring of Review Decisions

Social workers will have a process in place to ensure the continuous collection of information about the child’s progress as part of the overall assessment and care planning process, rather than waiting for the review meeting.

In preparation for review the social worker will be in a position to advise the IRO about:

  • The progress made in implementing the child’s care plan and achieving the specified outcomes for the child;
  • Any changes required to the provision of services; and
  • Any change required to the legal status of the child (this may include the need for care proceedings or discharge of the care order).

The social worker will prepare the child (subject to age and understanding) for their review. This will involve seeking the child’s views about who they would like to attend, where they would like the review to take place and what they would like to be discussed.

The social worker will also prepare and support parents, carers and professionals to participate or contribute in the child’s review. Preparation will involve consideration of what is going well for the child and what additional support they may need.

At least 4 weeks before the review the IRO will liaise with the social worker and gather the child’s views. This discussion will confirm who the child wants to attend their review and how they would like their meeting to happen. If the child has decided they want just the IRO and one or two other people to attend, the IRO will consult with the other key professionals or hold a series of discussions as necessary.

If difficult issues need to be discussed away from the child the IRO will decide the best forum for this to occur.

The IRO will record their preparatory discussions with the social worker on a ‘Preparation and Tracking’ record. This record will be stored on the child’s individual Carefirst record.

3. The Purpose of Reviews

The purpose of reviews is to monitor the progress of achieving the outcomes set out in the care plan and to make decisions to amend the plan as necessary in light of any changed information and circumstances. Reviews take place in order to ensure that the child’s welfare continues to be safeguarded and promoted in the most effective way throughout the period that s/he is looked after.

The IRO will ensure that the people responsible for implementing decisions made in the review are identified, and that where decisions are not implemented, this is brought to the attention of the senior officer within the responsible authority [regulation 36].

No significant changes to the care plan can be made unless it has been considered at a review chaired by the IRO, unless this is not reasonably practice.

The key plans that should be considered at a Review are:

IROs will ensure that transition planning is covered at each review. Developing increased independence towards adulthood is part of care planning for children and young people of all ages and supports them to move at their own pace and feel integrated and secure within their families and local communities.

The review will also take account of any other plans and relevant assessments (including the child’s Me and My World Assessment) in order to ensure that these remain up to date or that arrangements are in place to update them.

4. Frequency of Reviews


Normally, Reviews should be convened at the following intervals.

  • An initial Review should be conducted within 20 days of the child becoming Looked After (BLA);
  • The second Review should be conducted within three months of an Initial Review;
  • Subsequent Reviews should be conducted not more than six months after any previous review.

In relation to children placed with prospective adopters (same structure and frequency as above) or where there is Authority to Place for Adoption (Placement Order made but where the child has not yet been placed – the first review has to occur within 3 months of the Placement Order being made and then at intervals of not less than 6 months).

The functions of the IRO have been set out in Section 25B(1) of the 1989 Act and regulation 45 of the 2010 Regulations. Between reviews, if the care plan continues to meet the needs of the child, there may be no need for any communication between the IRO and the social worker or the child.


In the event of a significant change or event in the child’s life, the social worker must inform the IRO. The Review may be brought forward by an IRO where the circumstances of an event has a significant impact upon the child’s care plan, as suggested in the following sorts of circumstances:

  • A proposed change of care plan for example arising at short notice in the course of proceedings following directions from the court;
  • Where agreed decisions from the review are not carried out within the specified timescale;
  • Major change to the contact arrangements;
  • Changes of allocated social worker;
  • Any safeguarding concerns involving the child, which may lead to enquiries being made under Section 47 of the 1989 Act (‘child protection enquiries’) and outcomes of child protection conferences, or other meetings that are not attended by the IRO;
  • Complaints from or on behalf of the child, parent or carer;
  • Unexpected changes in the child’s placement provision which may significantly impact on placement stability or safeguarding arrangements;
  • Significant changes in birth family circumstances for example births, marriages or deaths which may have a particular impact on the child;
  • If the child is charged with any offence leading to referral to youth offending services, pending criminal proceedings and any convictions or sentences as a result of such proceedings;
  • If the child is excluded from school;
  • If the child has run away or is missing from an approved placement;
  • Significant health, medical events, diagnoses, illnesses, hospitalisations, or serious accidents; and panel decisions in relation to permanency.

DfE Children Act 1989 Guidance and Regulations - Volume 2: Care Planning, Placement and Case Review.

This is not an exhaustive list and the IRO may judge that other events are significant and require an earlier review. The parents and child should also be consulted about the need for an additional review.

5. Chairing of Reviews

Independent Reviewing Officers (IRO's) will chair reviews. They are located at The Clermont Unit, Child Protection Unit, 251 Preston Road, Brighton.

The IRO's responsibilities are outlined in Section 10, Independent Reviewing Officer's Responsibilities.

See also Appointment and Role of the Independent Reviewing Officer Procedure.

If the allocated IRO cannot attend the meeting and it is important that the review meeting is not delayed, the meeting will be chaired / attended by a substitute IRO.

6. Convening Reviews

6.1 Arranging the first review

As soon as a child becomes Looked After, the child's social worker must notify The Independent Reviewing Officer’s Business Support Manager (BSO) by telephone (x5973). (See also Children Looked After Being Placed Outside Brighton and Hove and Children Being Placed in Brighton and Hove by Other Local Authorities and Appendix 3: Standard Letter to Authorities Looking to Place Looked After Child in the Brighton and Hove Area and Appendix 4: CareFirst Recording for IRO Admin Team).

This will trigger the appointment of an Independent Reviewing Officer (IRO) for the child. The IRO’s Business Support Manager (BSO) will then agree the date and time of the child’s first Looked After Child review with the Social Worker and the SW will need to confirm the venue for the IRO asap.

The venue will be arranged by the social worker - ideally the review should take place in the placement but must take into account the wishes and feelings of the child / young person.

6.2 Arranging second and subsequent reviews

At the end of each review the IRO will set the date, time and venue for both the preparatory discussion with the social worker and the next review, taking account of what is convenient for review participants.

Review dates cannot be rearranged unless there are exceptional circumstances and then only if the rearranged meeting can take place within statutory timescales, in which case the new date should be agreed by the social worker with the IRO and the Social Worker will then inform the other participants.

In the event of a key participant being ill or unable to attend the review, the meeting will go ahead but the IRO may decide that the review be adjourned to a new date when all participants can attend - see Section 10, Independent Reviewing Officer's Responsibilities.

If there is a plan for the child to cease to be Looked After and if this was not agreed at the previous Review then the SW should notify the IRO and a review will be held as soon as possible to address the plans and consider the proposed change of Care Plan.

7. Invitations and the Child's Participation

Discussion should take place between the social worker and the child (subject to age and understanding) at least 20 working days before the meeting about who the child would like to attend the meeting and where the meeting will be held.

Invitations to reviews will be sent by the child's social worker in consultation with the IRO and the child. Invitations to reviews and contribution documents should be sent out by the SW to all those participating in the review at least 10 working days before the meeting. Completed Contribution booklets, from the child, parents and carers etc. should be returned to the SW in time to be forwarded to the IRO at least 3 working days before the Review.

The following people should normally be invited to participate in the meeting or to contribute to the review process:
  • The child. There is a presumption that the child will attend the review. A child's disability must not be a bar to the child's attendance;
  • The parents and those with Parental Responsibility, carers and any significant people or specialists involved in the child's case (except as set out below);
  • The supervising social worker, if the child is placed with foster carers;
  • The link worker if the child is in residential care;
  • The most appropriate teacher at the child's school (usually the Designated Teacher for Looked After and Previously Looked After Children);
  • A Personal Adviser, if the child is over the age of 16;
  • An Independent Visitor, if involved;
  • If required, an interpreter;
  • Any other person with a legitimate interest in the child e.g. current carer, health care professional, GP, a representative from the Local Authority in whose area it is proposed that the child will be placed (Such attendance should always be discussed with the child before invitations are made and his/her views obtained);
  • The officer with lead responsibility for implementing the authority's duty to promote the educational achievement of its looked after children;
  • The child’s court appointed Guardian where applicable;
  • The YOS worker if the child is placed in Youth Detention Accommodation.

A balance must be struck in relation to who the child wishes to be present and the need for information and input from the professionals and family members involved. Efforts should be made to keep the number present at the review as small as possible. It may be appropriate for information to be provided in writing or at a separate meeting where the contribution is strictly factual. It may also be more appropriate for the review process to be more than one meeting or for the IRO and SW to meet separately with family members if this accords with the views and best interest of the child.

Children and parents should also be informed that they can arrange to see the IRO separately if they wish or bring a supporter or interpreter to the review.

Where the child does not wish to attend the review, the IRO must at the very least speak to the child before the review - wherever possible in a face to face meeting.

The child's social worker must ensure that children and families have been given information about the Complaints Procedure. They should provide the child with details of independent advocacy services who may provide support if the child requires it.

See Section 9, Supporters and Interpreters.

A decision not to invite a child or parent(s) to a review should only be made in exceptional circumstances and in consultation with the IRO, prior to the review. The decision should be recorded, together with reasons, on the review document and child's record.

There may be exceptional circumstances where the child’s social worker, in consultation with the IRO decides that the attendance of the carer at all or part of the review meeting will not be appropriate or practicable. Where this is the case, a written explanation of the reasons should be given and other arrangements made for the carer to contribute to the review process. Details of the reasons why a carer is excluded and a record of their input should be placed on the child’s case record.

Where any other invited person cannot attend, the IRO may agree that a delegate attend instead.

8. The Role of the Social Worker

The child's social worker must discuss the purpose of the review with the child, parents and carers and consult the child about invitations at least 20 working days before the review meeting.

Where the child wishes to chair their own review, the social worker should inform the IRO. The IRO will also offer this option to the child before the review is due to commence and will support the child to chair or part chair if they wish.

In all cases, the child and parent(s) should be encouraged and supported by the social worker to prepare for the review, in writing or other ways if they wish, for example by seeing the IRO separately. The social worker should agree with the IRO how this will be achieved. This requires early consultation between the social worker and the IRO, and should be part of a thorough preparation of all the key issues for the review.

The child's social worker must also ensure the child's IRO is kept informed of any significant changes in the child's circumstances and the outcomes of any other meetings held as part of the review process, which consider aspects of the child's Care Plan. In addition, the social worker must notify the IRO if he or she believes that decisions made at a review are no longer appropriate because of a change in circumstances.

Where the child has been or is the subject of Court proceedings, the social worker should ensure the IRO has clear information of the child's legal status and the Court timetable.

For Looked After Children subject to Child Protection Plans, see Section 13, Reviews on Children who are the Subject of Child Protection Plans.

Prior to the review, the social worker must ensure the child's records and plans are up to date, for example, that they include records of the placement visits and the last date when the child's sleeping accommodation was seen. Any changes in household membership need to be clearly recorded.

The social worker must send / make available to the IRO the documents listed in Section 2, Preparation for Review and Monitoring of Review Decisions.

Copies of the previous review decisions and actions taken should be brought to the review by the social worker for all review participants.

In addition, the child's social worker should bring to the review one full copy of the Review document, Care Plan and any other relevant plans, reports from professionals and other relevant documents.

It is not necessary to copy these for all participants. The IRO may have a pre-meeting with the social worker to review the relevant aspects of the Care Plan, Health Plan and Personal Education Plan etc. The IRO will then summarise these documents during the review and provide information about the discussion with the social worker as appropriate.

After the review, the social worker is responsible for updating the Care Plan within 10 working days, in relation to any changes to the Care Plan agreed at the review.

The social worker should also update the Permanence Plan, Health Care Plan and Personal Education Plan as required, and arrange for a Pathway Plan to be completed / updated, if relevant.

The social worker should also ensure that the child's Placement Plan (recorded on the Placement Information Record) is updated.

Where the child and/or the parents are unable to attend the review, the social worker must ensure that they are informed in writing of the outcome.

See also Duty of Social Worker to keep IRO informed, Appointment and Role of Independent Reviewing Officer Procedure (this is the new guidance / chapter).

9. Supporters and Interpreters

The social worker and IRO should consider prior to the review whether either the child or parent(s) would benefit from the presence of a supporter or advocate (such as a representative from the Youth Advocacy Project) and if so, the social worker should ensure the necessary arrangements are made. A supporter may be either an advocate on behalf of the child / parent(s) or a person with specialist skills or knowledge.

It may also be necessary for the social worker to make arrangements for an interpreter to attend. Special needs, for example those arising from disability, should always be considered and appropriate assistance arranged where relevant.

Any request by the child or parent(s) for their legal adviser to attend as their supporter should be notified to the IRO prior to the review. It would be rare for approval to be given for a Legal advisor to be present (apart from a child’s request).

10. Independent Reviewing Officer's Responsibilities

The IRO's role is to chair Reviews and monitor the appropriateness of the Care Plan (on an ongoing basis including whether any safeguarding issues arise), its implementation and to establish whether the milestones set out in the plan are being achieved in a timely way.

See also Appointment and Role of the Independent Reviewing Officer Procedure, which sets out in detail to role of the IRO outside the Review.

In relation to their role at reviews, a key task for all IRO's is to ensure that the review process is child centred and that the child's views are heard. They should be satisfied that disabled children's contributions are obtained and effectively presented in the review.

At least 4 weeks before the child’s review the IRO will liaise with the social worker about the progress of decisions and steps taken by the social worker to gather the child’s views (see Section 2, Preparation for Review).

If difficult issues need to be discussed away from the child the IRO will consult as necessary and will reach a decision about the best forum for this to occur.

The IRO should consult the child about their Care Plan at each review and at any time that there is a significant change to the Care Plan. The IRO should contact / meet the child before the first Review and arrange further contact with the child as appropriate in advance of subsequent Reviews.

The IRO must be satisfied that the wishes and feelings of the child’s parents, any person who is not a parent but who has parental responsibility and the current carer (foster carer or registered person in respect of a children’s home) have been taken into account as part of the review process.

Wherever appropriate, the child will be encouraged to chair the meeting and in these circumstances the IRO will assist the child. In all other cases, the IRO will chair the review - see Section 5, Chairing of Reviews.

More than one meeting may be required to ensure the views of relevant people inform the review without the meeting becoming too large. For example it may be appropriate to hold a meeting involving the child prior to a meeting involving the parent to obtain information and ascertain the views of both where the child does not wish to attend a review with their parents present.

The IRO is responsible for ensuring that all relevant people, including the child and parents, understand the purpose of the review and have been given appropriate opportunities to contribute and express their views. The IRO should also ensure that relevant consultation has taken place with those professionals who are not in attendance at the meeting.

Where participants' views are not followed, an explanation of the reasons why needs to be provided by the IRO and/or the social worker. Any differences of opinion should be recorded in the review record.

If the parent(s) or the child brings a supporter, the IRO will need to explain their role, ensuring that the supporter understands that he or she may clarify information but may not cross-examine any contributor.

Where the ‘supporter’ is a legal representative then the IRO should note the Law Society guidance ‘Attendance of Solicitors at Local Authority Children Act Meetings’ and related Code of Conduct (2011).

All solicitors attending these meetings should be aware of the local policies and procedures in respect of Children Act Meetings.

The agenda for each review will be agreed at the beginning of the meeting and each participant will be invited to contribute their own items to the agenda and have the opportunity to contribute to the discussion.

The IRO will decide on what actions in principle are necessary to meet the child's reviewed needs and formulate decisions as to how these should be achieved.

Where a review considers that adoption or long term fostering is the most appropriate way to meet the child's needs, the decision also needs to be submitted to the Permanence Panel by the Social Worker.

The IRO may adjourn a review meeting once, for not more than 20 working days, if not satisfied that sufficient information has been provided by the Local Authority to enable proper consideration of any of the factors to be considered.

The IRO should consider the effects on the child of delaying the meeting, and seek the wishes and feelings of the child, carer and parents where appropriate.

No proposal under consideration at the adjourned review can normally be implemented until the review has been completed.

It will be necessary for the IRO to ensure decisions are clear and establish who is responsible for action and the timescales agreed for completion. The IRO should ensure that the following are considered and accounted for during the review:

  1. The effect of any change in the child's circumstances since the last review, any change made to the Care Plan, whether decisions taken at the last review have been successfully implemented and if not the reasons;
  2. Whether any change should be sought in the child's legal status;
  3. Whether there is a plan for permanence;
  4. Arrangements for contact / whether there is any need for changes to the arrangements in order to promote contact between the child and parents / other Connected Persons;
  5. Whether the placement continues to be the most appropriate available, whether any change to the placement agreement or any other aspect of the arrangements is likely to become necessary before the next review;
  6. Whether the placement safeguards and promotes the child’s welfare, and whether any safeguarding concerns have been raised;
  7. The child's educational needs, progress and development and whether any change is likely to become necessary or desirable before the next review, including consideration of his/her most recent assessment of progress and development; whether the arrangements are meeting the child's educational needs; whether the child has a Personal Education Plan (PEP) and whether its content provides a clear framework for promoting educational achievement;
  8. The child's leisure interests and activities and whether the arrangements are meeting his/her needs;
  9. The child's health report, and whether any change in health care arrangements is likely to be necessary or desirable before the next review; whether the content of the Health Plan provides a clear framework for promoting the child's health; whether the arrangements are meeting the child's health needs;
  10. Whether the child's needs related to identity are being met and whether any change is required having regard to the child's religious persuasion, racial origin and cultural background;
  11. Whether the arrangements for advice, support and assistance continue to be appropriate and understood by the child;
  12. Whether any arrangements need to be made for the time when the child will no longer be looked after;
  13. The child's wishes and feelings and the views of the IRO about any aspect of the case and in particular about any changes made since the last review or proposed to be made to the Care Plan; whether the plan fulfils the duty to safeguard and promote the child's welfare and whether it would be in the child's interests for an Independent Visitor to be appointed;
  14. Where the child is placed with parents before an assessment is completed, the frequency of the social worker's visits;
  15. Whether the delegation of authority to take decisions about a child’s care continues to be appropriate and in the child’s best interests;
  16. Other matters which may arise should also be considered with due regard to the circumstances of the child and the placement.

After the review and within 2 working days, the IRO will notify the Independent Reviewing Officer Administration team of the way in which the child participated in the review, together with the decisions / outcome letter and the date for the next review.

Where there is evidence of poor practice, the IRO will consider what action is needed to bring this to the attention of the relevant and appropriate managers - see Section 16, Monitoring of Review Decisions. Also the IRO will provide positive feedback on good performance to the Social Worker and their managers by email

It is also the IRO responsibility to focus on conflict resolution - see Section 17, Conflict Resolution.

Children who are Section 20 Accommodated (Children Act 1989): IROs should pay particular regard to children accommodated under S.20 to ensure there is appropriate progression of their plans and that there are no delays in respect of them having ‘permanence’, (which should include a return home). A High Court judgement (see Herefordshire Council v AB [2018] EWFC 10 rtf) was critical of protracted delay in a child’s planning and failure to respond to a parent’s request to have a child return home to their care under S. 20(8). Further, that the IRO, whilst recognising the issues of delay and planning, and highlighting these to managers, did not respond more robustly (see Section 17, Conflict Resolution).

The judgement considered that in circumstances where the threshold criteria (for Care / Supervision Orders) under Section 31 Children Act 1989 are met, (i.e. where a child is at risk of significant harm, or the likelihood of significant harm), then care proceedings should be issued without delay.

11. The Role of the Review in Achieving Permanence for the Child

The Independent Reviewing Officer (IRO) must check that the child's Care Plan includes a Permanence Plan with measurable milestones and a Contingency Plan should the preferred plans not materialise.

At the second Review, there is a requirement to focus on the Permanence Plan, to ensure it provides permanence for the child within a timescale which is realistic, achievable and meets the child's needs.

If it is considered that the chosen avenue to permanence is not viable, the IRO should ensure that the social worker arranges as a matter of urgency to consider the most appropriate permanent alternative.

From the second (4 months) Review there may be a need for a Twin Track / Parallel Plan to be made where a Permanence Plan has not been achieved. For example where a plan for rehabilitation of the child has not been achieved, the Review should seek to establish whether the lack of progress is as a result of drift or whether there are valid child-centred reasons, properly recorded and endorsed by the social worker's manager. 

All subsequent Reviews should review the progress and validity of the Permanence Plan.

12. Reviews Concerning Children in Long Term Foster Placements.

The March 2015 Statutory Guidance “Permanence, long-term foster placements and ceasing to look after a child” sets out that where a child is placed in a designated long-term foster placement and has been in this placement for more than a year consideration should be given to whether it is necessary to hold a meeting as part of each review.

It is expected that annual meetings will only be appropriate in exceptional circumstances. The decision to hold an annual meeting must be made by the Head of Service with Practice Lead for Looked After Children following consultation by the social worker with the young person, carer and IRO.

Where it is agreed that a meeting will not be held as part of every review a meeting should be held at least once a year. The factors leading to a decision to hold review meetings on a less frequent basis must be recorded in the child’s Care Plan.

Where a decision is taken that the review process will not include a meeting the IRO must ensure that full consultation with all relevant individuals, including the child, has taken place to inform the review of the child’s case.

13. Reviews on Children who are the Subject of Child Protection Plans

Where a looked after child remains the subject of a Child Protection Plan, there should be a single planning and reviewing process, led by the IRO, leading to the development of a single / combined plan.

The IRO will chair the Child Protection Conference where a looked after child remains subject to a Child Protection Plan.

The timing of the review of the child protection aspects of the Care Plan should be as in Section 4, Frequency of Reviews.

The Review, when reviewing the child protection aspects of the plan, should consider whether the criteria continue to be met for the child to remain the subject of a Child Protection Plan. 

Consideration must be given to ensuring that the multi-agency contribution to the review of the Child Protection Plan is addressed within the review of the Care Plan.

14. Recording of Reviews

It is the responsibility of the Independent Reviewing Officer (IRO) to record the review. A written record of the decisions will be completed by the IRO and circulated by the Social Work team to all participants within 5 working days of the meeting. This should also be sent to the designated senior manager who will consider the decisions made at the review - see Section 15, Review Decisions.

The full written record of the review will be completed within 15 working days of the review. The full record should contain an accurate and comprehensive record of the meeting, or meetings, which constituted the review and of the views of all those who attended or were consulted as part of the review process. The record should also reflect the review process for a designated long term foster placement where a meeting did not take place. The IRO team will notify the Social Work team when the document has been completed. The Social Work team administration will then distribute to all invitees / participants unless advised differently.

The decisions should have any identifying details removed as necessary, for example, exceptionally, the address of the placement.

Where parents do not attend the review / part of the meeting and contribute their views in some other manner, a discussion should take place between the social worker and the IRO as to whether it is in the child's interest for the parents to receive a full record of the review, and, if not, what written information should be sent to them. Examples of where this should be a consideration are where there is a 'no contact order' or supervised contact only.

15. Review Decisions

A Pod Team Manager should consider the decisions made at each Review within five working days of receiving them and to advise the IRO and all those who attended the review if they are unable to agree them. 

If no response is received the decisions should be considered agreed by the Local Authority and should be implemented within the timescales set out in them.

If the senior member of staff disagrees with any of the decisions within that initial five working day period, this should be notified in writing to the IRO and all those who attended the review.

In the first instance the IRO should attempt to resolve the issue informally. If this is not successful the IRO can consider activating the local dispute resolution process - see Section 17, Conflict Resolution.

16. Monitoring of Review Decisions

The Independent Reviewing Officer (IRO) plays an important part in the quality assurance function of the local authority's service for looked after children, it will be important that they recognise and report on good practice by individuals or teams.

It is important for the IRO to have a collaborative relationship with the social workers and their managers.

Monitoring sheets must be completed by the IRO after every review meeting in order that accurate data is reported for audit, quality assurance and individual performance management. This information is then coordinated by the Performance Analysts Unit.

Where there is evidence of poor practice, the IRO should, wherever practicable, address these issues through the normal channels, informally by contacting the social worker / manager or formally by using the Dispute Resolution Procedure in discussion with the Independent Reviewing Officer - Manager.

17. Conflict Resolution

See Practice Recognition & Issue Resolution Process.